E. Ruusuvuori
To Win
I. Simakin
To Win
Emil Ruusuvuori vs Jan-Lennard Struff Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W L W W L L L
Form
W W L L L L L L L LHead-To-Head: Ruusuvuori 1 - 1 Struff
They have played 5 sets in total, with Ruusuvuori winning 3 and Struff winning 2. The last match between Ruusuvuori and Struff was at the ABN AMRO Open - Rotterdam, 15-02-2024, Second, I.hard with Emil Ruusuvuori getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Emil Ruusuvuori | 1 |
| Jan-Lennard Struff | 1 |
ABN AMRO Open - Rotterdam(15-02-2024)
6
3
6
3
| Ruusuvuori | Stats | Struff |
|---|---|---|
| 42% (5-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 21% (3-11) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 228 | Ranking | 79 |
| 37 | Highest Rank | 21 |
| 26 | Age | 34 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 10 | Titles | 13 |
| 61% (284-184) | Career Total W/L | 57% (578-438) |
| $2,614,675 | Career Prize Money | $5,247,770 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
Upcoming Match
TBD VS Struff
- / First
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kostovic VS Stefanini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Agut VS Clar PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Ruusuvuori VS Struff H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Jan-Lennard Struff
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
5
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
| 7-6(4) 5-7 6-0 |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
47%
(
50 of
106)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
95)
5
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
39 of
60)
55%
(
31 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
42%
(
45 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
95)
102
Total Points Won
99
|
||||
Ruusuvuori VS Struff H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 25 | Games Won | 24 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 15 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1:49:56 | Average Match Time | 1:49:56 |
| 63% (95/151) | 1st Serve % | 53% (81/154) |
| 68% (65/95) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (52/81) |
| 48% (27/56) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (36/73) |
| 60% (9/15) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 62% (8/13) |
| 43% (66/154) | Return Points Win % | 39% (59/151) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Emil Ruusuvuori Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
49%
(
32 of
65)
2
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
3
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve %
50%
(
15 of
30)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
93%
(
14 of
15)
1st Serve Won
87%
(
13 of
15)
20%
(
1 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
5 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
25
Total Points Won
25
|
4-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
12
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Gauthier Onclin
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Oleg Prihodko
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
6
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
27 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Borna Coric
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
10 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
54
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 2-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Matisse Bobichon
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
30%
(
6 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Clement Chidekh
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
97)
11
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
5
82%
(
42 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
97)
94
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
91)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
43 of
56)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
93
|
7-5 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Jan-Lennard Struff Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Jan-Lennard Struff
47%
(
18 of
38)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
94%
(
17 of
18)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valentin Vacherot
Player
Jan-Lennard Struff
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
Jan-Lennard Struff
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
4
Aces
12
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
29 of
35)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
28%
(
20 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
66)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Joao Fonseca
Player
Jan-Lennard Struff
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
94
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gael Monfils
Player
Jan-Lennard Struff
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
53%
(
36 of
68)
7
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
29 of
36)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Jan-Lennard Struff
55%
(
39 of
71)
1st Serve %
66%
(
62 of
94)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
44 of
62)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
10%
(
1 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
20 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
94)
87
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Jan-Lennard Struff
71%
(
65 of
92)
1st Serve %
72%
(
71 of
98)
8
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
1
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
52 of
71)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
28 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
98)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
7-6(5) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Jan-Lennard Struff
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Hugo Grenier
61%
(
59 of
96)
1st Serve %
67%
(
77 of
115)
16
Aces
14
4
Double Faults
5
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
51 of
77)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
36 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
50 of
115)
110
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Manuel Guinard
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve %
48%
(
47 of
97)
18
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
10
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
97)
97
Total Points Won
86
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (284/184) | Win/Loss | 57% (578/438) |
| 58% (640/465) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (1385/1110) |
| 53% (5638/4943) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (12767/11612) |
| 65% (120/65) | Hard Win/Loss | 47% (98/110) |
| 47% (47/54) | Clay Win/Loss | 62% (272/170) |
| 67% (103/50) | Indoor Hard W/L | 59% (180/124) |
| 48% (14/15) | Grass Win/Loss | 45% (28/34) |
| 0.33 | Aces Per Game | 0.55 |
| 1724 | Aces Total | 6600 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 1369 | Total Double Faults | 2988 |
| 1:34:18 | Average Match Time | 1:19:14 |
| 355.95 | Average Opponent Rank | 450.83 |
| 65% (19980/30921) | 1st Serve % | 56% (36161/64099) |
| 71% (14172/19980) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (27220/36161) |
| 51% (5555/10941) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (14116/27929) |
| 42% (1303/3122) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (2186/5628) |
| 40% (12727/31787) | Return Points Win % | 37% (24159/65002) |
| 39% (11/17) | Slam W/L | 48% (43/46) |
| 51% (28/27) | Masters W/L | 54% (73/61) |
| 67% (14/7) | Cups W/L | 59% (20/14) |
| 57% (86/64) | Main Tour W/L | 47% (153/170) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 63% (71/41) | Challenger W/L | 64% (188/104) |
| 73% (74/28) | Futures W/L | 71% (99/41) |
| 62% (269/432) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (541/935) |
| 39% (11/28) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 41% (31/75) |
| 53% (81/152) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (226/460) |
| 56% (74/132) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (175/355) |
| 89% (285/253) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (577/477) |
| 11% (285/32) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (577/100) |
| 17% (181/30) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (439/100) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
